| From an
advertising point of view, the 2006 election on Long
Island figured to be a snoozer.
The governor's race has
effectively been over for months, as has the U.S. Senate
race. None of Long Island's U.S. representatives face a
serious challenge this year, and the Island's nine state
senators - all Republicans - looked, as recently as four
months ago, as though they would breeze back into
office.
For all these reasons,
John Mangano, president of New Media Printing in
Bethpage, figured this would be an off year, with fewer
direct mail opportunities and fewer yard signs to make.
"But it's going
pretty well," he said this week. "We're doing
the same, if not more, than two years ago. More local
candidates are putting out products. I don't think I see
anyone rolling over dead."
Paradoxically, the same
political forces that have turned the governor and U.S.
Senate races into sleepwalks have made two of the
Island's state Senate races advertising hotbeds. Since
Democrats Eliot Spitzer and Hillary Clinton have sewn up
their races, Republicans have redoubled their efforts on
local races, said Michael Dawidziak, a Bohemia-based
political consultant who mainly works with the GOP.
"People, generally,
come out on Election Day to vote for the top of the
ticket," Dawidziak said, and with no coattails to
ride, the two Island state senators considered most
vulnerable - John Flanagan, whose district stretches
along western Suffolk's North Shore, and Caesar Trunzo
in Islip - have been forced to blitz the region with
advertising to beat back a larger Democratic wave.
"Republican
incumbents are intensifying their efforts on every
level," said Richard Guardino, dean of Hofstra
University's School for Suburban Studies, who has
observed little abatement in campaign spending this
fall. "At a minimum, the Republican incumbents will
want to drive out their base support and make sure they
get to the polls."
The problem is compounded
for the GOP, given the national mood, Dawidziak said.
"The president's approval ratings are in the tank,
and the congressional leadership looks like The Three
Stooges," he added.
Guardino said 2006 is
shaping up to be like 1974, when a Watergate-fueled
backlash against Republicans filtered down to local
elections, or 1984, when Ronald Reagan's enormous
popularity lifted even the most obscure Republican.
"The Senate
Republicans are spending everything they can,"
Dawidziak said. "That's probably smart, because
it's going to be a Democratic tsunami."
By the time Nov. 7
arrives, Flanagan and Trunzo will likely have spent $1
million each on advertising, said Anthony Manetta,
president of Roosevelt Strategy Group, a consultancy
working on several Long Island and statewide races,
including the campaign of Jeanine Pirro, the GOP
attorney general nominee.
Republican unease is
filtering down to other local races, too. Manetta said
his client, Suffolk County Clerk Judy Pascale, has
started running TV and radio ads for her re-election
bid.
"I don't think that
ad spending is necessarily down," he said.
Over an eight-day span in
late September, for instance, Flanagan's campaign spent
nearly $80,000 on television ads, according to the state
Board of Elections. During the same period, Trunzo spent
$40,000 on television spots.
Two years ago, state Sen.
Carl Marcellino, R-Syosset, turned heads by spending
more than $550,000 on his own campaign, with another
$600,000 coming from state party leaders. Trunzo and
Flanagan are poised to top that record amount, said
political commentator Jerry Kremer, a former Democratic
assemblyman.
Even if Flanagan and
Trunzo aren't thought to be in dire danger of losing
their seats, the state's GOP doesn't want to wake up
Nov. 8 to find out it lost its precious Senate majority
because it didn't spend every dime it could.
"Control of the
state Senate is so important that they must empty out
the checkbook to keep their majority," Kremer said.
"They're going to break all spending records, and
they're going to survive."
The focus on local races
means that Cablevision Systems Corp. is positioned to
reap most of the rewards, especially because standard
broadcast advertising in the New York metropolitan
market is prohibitively expensive, except for the
most-endowed campaigns. A company spokesman declined to
comment for this story, but a national trade group
predicted $200 million in cable advertising in 2006, a
significant increase from two years ago.
Copyright 2006 Dolan
Media Newswires
|